IP and ATM failed to deliver ?
well i don't say this but got this from the web site
of a competitor of cisco!!
But that is besides the point. Below I have reproduced
the text verbatim.
what it says that both IP and ATM failed as carriers
to carry puredata
due to different reasons as explained
Be interesting to see the full context of this. Where it came from
might clue one into any bias. I do know the are issue scaling ATM SVC's
but we have a huge ATM backbone.
Dave
John Green wrote:
IP and ATM failed to deliver ?
well i don't say this but got this from the web site
of
That's called marketing-speak. You are having the right reaction of a true
engineer (i.e. skepticism!) ;-) One of the biggest networks in the world is
based on IP and ATM (and other technologies). It's called the Internet.
Priscilla
At 12:17 PM 11/14/01, John Green wrote:
IP and ATM failed to
IMHO, this is a little vague and definitely out of date.
Although both ATM and IP held the promise of building
converged
networks in principle, neither actually delivered in
practice. ATM
networks were unsuccessful because they could not
scale to the levels
required for pure data
4 matches
Mail list logo
