SEE BELOW. I have a router with a loopback address This address is being used by Serial0/0.1 and Serial0/0.3. Is this a legal use of loopback addressing - or would it lead to ip duplicate conflicts within routing processes. (The ARP table shows no entries when these i/faces are pinged). Is this addressing 'valid' ?
..Sh ip int brie... Serial0/0 unassigned YES unset up up Serial0/0.1 146.135.171.209 YES unset up up Serial0/0.2 10.220.38.30 YES NVRAM up up Serial0/0.3 146.135.171.209 YES unset up up .sh run.. interface Loopback1 ip address 146.135.171.209 255.255.255.255 no ip directed-broadcast ! interface Ethernet0/0 ip address 10.31.0.1 255.255.252.0 no ip directed-broadcast ipx encapsulation SAP ipx network 10310000 ! interface Serial0/0 no ip address no ip directed-broadcast encapsulation frame-relay no ip mroute-cache random-detect frame-relay lmi-type ansi ! interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point ip unnumbered Loopback1 no ip directed-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 445 ! interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point ip address 10.220.38.30 255.255.255.252 no ip directed-broadcast ipx network 19468416 frame-relay interface-dlci 150 ! interface Serial0/0.3 point-to-point description 8K Management PVC to Docklands bandwidth 8 ip unnumbered Loopback1 no ip directed-broadcast frame-relay interface-dlci 446 ! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66676&t=66676 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
