Re: LLC2 [7:8315]

2001-06-14 Thread Michael L. Williams
"Burnham, Chris" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Michael I am a bit confused.If you have SNA still on the network (which most > big Corporates do) would you not be using Token Ring? > Can you run SNA over Ethernet using LLC2? why only LLC2 & not LLC1 or EV2 ?? It

Re: LLC2 [7:8315]

2001-06-14 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
>Thank-you to Howard, Rita, and others for their answers. > >At 05:22 AM 6/13/01, Burnham, Chris wrote: >>Michael I am a bit confused.If you have SNA still on the network (which most >>big Corporates do) would you not be using Token Ring? >>Can you run SNA over Ethernet using LLC2? > >Yes, running

Re: LLC2 [7:8315]

2001-06-13 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Thank-you to Howard, Rita, and others for their answers. At 05:22 AM 6/13/01, Burnham, Chris wrote: >Michael I am a bit confused.If you have SNA still on the network (which most >big Corporates do) would you not be using Token Ring? >Can you run SNA over Ethernet using LLC2? Yes, running SNA ove

LLC2 [7:8315]

2001-06-13 Thread Burnham, Chris
Michael I am a bit confused.If you have SNA still on the network (which most big Corporates do) would you not be using Token Ring? Can you run SNA over Ethernet using LLC2? why only LLC2 & not LLC1 or EV2 ?? Below you stated that LLC2 is diminishing because of the reliability of higher protocols