Lab equipment question [7:49123]

2002-07-18 Thread John McCartney
Hey guys, I have a question about soem equipment I have for my home lab. I have an AS5200 and a Cat5005 that I'm thinking about selling, do I really need them to help pass the CCIE lab? I'm thinking of keeping the 5200 because of the Bri port. Any thoughts? Message Posted at: http://www.groupst

RE: Lab equipment question [7:49123]

2002-07-18 Thread Juan Blanco
AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lab equipment question [7:49123] Hey guys, I have a question about soem equipment I have for my home lab. I have an AS5200 and a Cat5005 that I'm thinking about selling, do I really need them to help pass the CCIE lab? I'm thinking of keeping the 5200

Re: Lab equipment question [7:49123]

2002-07-18 Thread nrf
""John McCartney"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Hey guys, > > I have a question about soem equipment I have for my home lab. I have an > AS5200 and a Cat5005 that I'm thinking about selling, do I really need them > to help pass the CCIE lab? I'm thinking of keep

Re: Lab equipment question [7:49123]

2002-07-18 Thread John McCartney
"Uh, what BRI port? The 5200 doesn't have any BRI port" I meant PRI, sorry...typo today Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49140&t=49123 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cis

RE: Lab equipment question [7:49123]

2002-07-18 Thread Kaminski, Shawn G
still need to keep up your set-based chops! Shawn K. -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Lab equipment question [7:49123] Hey guys, Actually I have the same dilemma with my 5500, Shoul

Re: Lab equipment question [7:49123]

2002-07-18 Thread Eric Rogers
ing tree, yada yada... -Eric - Original Message - From: "Kaminski, Shawn G" To: Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:38 PM Subject: RE: Lab equipment question [7:49123] > The last time I looked on eBay, 5500's weren't selling very well. > Personally, I'm