Re: Layer3 switching--Follow Up Question

2000-11-18 Thread Jason Roysdon
dcast domains then no broadcasts would ever > >be forward to other ports even if all the devices plugged into it were in > >the same vlan and subnet. > > > > > >----- Original Message - > >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To

Re: Layer3 switching--Follow Up Question

2000-10-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
es plugged into it were in >the same vlan and subnet. > > >- Original Message - >From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "NetEng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 3:06 PM >Subject: Re:

Re: Layer3 switching--Follow Up Question

2000-10-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 09:17 AM 10/4/00, NetEng wrote: >Does a 32 port layer3 switch module then have 32 collision/broadcast domains? Yes. > What about broadcast based services? What about it?? Priscilla > > >>""NetEng"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in >>message <8rdafq$kqb$[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Layer3 switching--Follow Up Question

2000-10-04 Thread NetEng
Does a 32 port layer3 switch module then have 32 collision/broadcast domains? What about broadcast based services?     ""NetEng"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8rdafq$kqb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8rdafq$kqb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... What are the benefits of layer3 switching (versus