Load Balancing with EIGRP

2001-03-21 Thread Rizzo Damian
Were currently using EIGRP as our routing protocol and we now have two separate T1 connections that were running Frame-relay on. If my understanding of EIGRP is correct, then I shouldn't have to make any modifications to the router in order for load balancing to take effect correct? Thanks!

Re: Load Balancing with EIGRP

2001-03-21 Thread James Haynes
Provided these paths are equal metrics in the routing table you will have load balancing. However, if you have fast switching on the load balancing will be on a destination by destination basis. To achieve load balancing on a packet by packet basis you need to turn fast switching off. Jim

RE: Load Balancing with EIGRP

2001-03-21 Thread Buri, Heather H
, 2001 2:54 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Load Balancing with EIGRP Were currently using EIGRP as our routing protocol and we now have two separate T1 connections that were running Frame-relay on. If my understanding of EIGRP is correct, then I shouldn't have to make any modifications

RE: Load Balancing with EIGRP

2001-03-21 Thread Chris Lemagie
Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:54 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Load Balancing with EIGRP Were currently using EIGRP as our routing protocol and we now have two separate T1 connections that were running Frame-relay on. If my understanding of EIGRP is correct, then I shouldn't have t

Re: Load Balancing with EIGRP

2001-03-21 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 04:18 PM 3/21/01, James Haynes wrote: Provided these paths are equal metrics in the routing table you will have load balancing. However, if you have fast switching on the load balancing will be on a destination by destination basis. True. This is especially bad news if all the traffic is