Were currently using EIGRP as our routing protocol and we now have two
separate T1 connections that were running Frame-relay on. If my
understanding of EIGRP is correct, then I shouldn't have to make any
modifications to the router in order for load balancing to take effect
correct?
Thanks!
Provided these paths are equal metrics in the routing table you will have
load balancing. However, if you have fast switching on the load balancing
will be on a destination by destination basis. To achieve load balancing on
a packet by packet basis you need to turn fast switching off.
Jim
, 2001 2:54 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Load Balancing with EIGRP
Were currently using EIGRP as our routing protocol and we now have two
separate T1 connections that were running Frame-relay on. If my
understanding of EIGRP is correct, then I shouldn't have to make any
modifications
Wednesday, March 21, 2001 12:54 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Load Balancing with EIGRP
Were currently using EIGRP as our routing protocol and we now have two
separate T1 connections that were running Frame-relay on. If my
understanding of EIGRP is correct, then I shouldn't have t
At 04:18 PM 3/21/01, James Haynes wrote:
Provided these paths are equal metrics in the routing table you will have
load balancing. However, if you have fast switching on the load balancing
will be on a destination by destination basis.
True. This is especially bad news if all the traffic is
5 matches
Mail list logo