Re: Multiple EIGRP Processes [7:13774]

SNIP Well, in my situation, as soon as eigrp AS 2 is implemented on B and C, B loses all the routes advertised by C until I clear the eigrp neighbors. At that point this begins to work correctly. END SNIP. I don't think you've got anything wrong here, but you maybe just pushing EIGRP a bit

Multiple EIGRP Processes [7:13774]

Let's say I have the following topology: A | | B--C | | D Routers A, B, and C are participating in EIGRP AS 1, so those three routers are aware of everything except routes on the other side of D. Then, I add EIGRP AS 2 to routers B, C, and D but not A. It's my understanding that

RE: Multiple EIGRP Processes [7:13774]

]] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 11:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multiple EIGRP Processes [7:13774] Let's say I have the following topology: A | | B--C | | D Routers A, B, and C are participating in EIGRP AS 1, so those three routers are aware of everything except routes