or MIS Operator,CCNA
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Chang)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 2:29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]
>
> Dear CiscoGroupstudy.com
>
>
What's the reason for not using the supervisor module Eth port to provide
the trunk? TIA!
Robert
-Original Message-
From: Dwayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7
29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]
Dear CiscoGroupstudy.com
I am having trouble getting the trunk up between a Cisco 7513 Router
and a Cisco Switch 5500 so that VLAN's 10 and 20 can cross it. It may
be because I can't se
Your sc0 interface can be in either VLAN you've mentioned or something
different. The trunk should be configured something like this to allow VLANs
10 and 20 to traverse the cable:
Cat5K (enable) >
set port enable 1/1
set port duplex 1/1 full
set trunk 1/1 on 10,20
Rtr7513#
!
int fa
Dear CiscoGroupstudy.com
I am having trouble getting the trunk up between a Cisco 7513 Router
and a Cisco Switch 5500 so that VLAN's 10 and 20 can cross it. It may
be because I can't set interface sc0 on the 5500 switch correctly.
Assume VLAN 10 is 10.10.0.0/1
5 matches
Mail list logo