Re: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]

2001-05-02 Thread El Pingu
or MIS Operator,CCNA > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Chang) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, 3 May 2001 2:29 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905] > > Dear CiscoGroupstudy.com > >

RE: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]

2001-05-02 Thread Lopez, Robert
What's the reason for not using the supervisor module Eth port to provide the trunk? TIA! Robert -Original Message- From: Dwayne Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:10 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7

RE: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]

2001-05-02 Thread Dwayne Saunders
29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905] Dear CiscoGroupstudy.com I am having trouble getting the trunk up between a Cisco 7513 Router and a Cisco Switch 5500 so that VLAN's 10 and 20 can cross it. It may be because I can't se

Re: Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]

2001-05-02 Thread Darren Crawford
Your sc0 interface can be in either VLAN you've mentioned or something different. The trunk should be configured something like this to allow VLANs 10 and 20 to traverse the cable: Cat5K (enable) > set port enable 1/1 set port duplex 1/1 full set trunk 1/1 on 10,20 Rtr7513# ! int fa

Multiple VLAN addressing question [7:2905]

2001-05-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Richard Chang)
Dear CiscoGroupstudy.com I am having trouble getting the trunk up between a Cisco 7513 Router and a Cisco Switch 5500 so that VLAN's 10 and 20 can cross it. It may be because I can't set interface sc0 on the 5500 switch correctly. Assume VLAN 10 is 10.10.0.0/1