Hi guys,

Hoping to pick someone's brain about this issue that we're seeing:

We have two 6509 Cat switches with a Gig trunk and RSM's.  Multiple VLAN's
are configured on the RSM and we are running OSPF (area 0).  The problem we
have is that the two 6509's are forming OSPF adjacancies with each other on
every vlan (via the Gig trunk).   So if we have 4 vlans set up there are 4
sets of OSPF neighbor adjancies set up, for example:

Neighbor ID     Pri   State           Dead Time   Address         Interface
lo-3.bob                1   FULL/DR         00:00:38    192.168.1.140 Vlan1
lo-3.bob                1   2WAY/DROTHER    00:00:32    192.168.1.172 Vlan30
lo-3.bob                1   2WAY/DROTHER    00:00:32    192.168.1.188 Vlan35
lo-3.bob                1   FULL/BDR        00:00:37    192.168.1.34  Vlan100

[The names and IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent!]

The same is also true on the partnering router "Bill".

Now, in reality, there are about 10 or 12 vlans in this setup, most of them
are passive interfaced so they do not add into the equation.  We can't
passive interface these vlans because they are used for distribution to
different OSPF areas.
My question is this, how can we ensure that bob and bill only form one
adjacancy with one another, not one per vlan.  We were hoping to do
something like a "source-interface" whereby you specify that OSPF
adjacancies are formed on a given address (eg a loopback int), that way
regardless of how many vlans bob and bill can see each other on, they will
only form adjacancies on one IP address with one another.

Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

(Here's were it's something REALLY obvious and I look silly)...

Cheers guys,

Scott Riley
Senior Network Engineer
Firstnet Services Ltd
W: http://www.firstnet.net.uk

[This message subject to: http://www.firstnet.net.uk/disclaimer.html]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=31402&t=31402
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to