OSPF and E2's, why default? [7:27390]

Since we were talking a little about OSPF today, I'd like to pose a question. When it comes to Path Types, Cisco uses E2's by default rather than E1's. Can someone tell me why? If E1's include the cost of the path to the ASBR that is distributing that route information into the autonomous system w

RE: OSPF and E2's, why default? [7:27390]

Hello Christopher, If I am not mistaken, E2 is always used by default, but if E1 and E2 are both available for the same destination, E1 will be used. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/104/3.html Alex Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=27403&t=27390 -

Re: OSPF and E2's, why default? [7:27390]

01 7:27 AM Subject: RE: OSPF and E2's, why default? [7:27390] > Hello Christopher, > > If I am not mistaken, E2 is always used by default, but if E1 and E2 are > both available for the same destination, E1 will be used. > > http://www.cisco.co