oc192. --
RFC 1149 Compliant. ""bergenpeak"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Suppose you have a network with a mix of FE, GE, OC-3/12/48 POS > links. > > With the standard OSPF link costing mechanism, all of these links > turn out to have a link cost of 1. > > Are there reasons to not go ahead and change the link cost calculation > via the auto-cost reference-bandwidth command to better reference the > link capacities? (I'm assuming that changing this value on all > routers will cause a cascade of LSAs and SPF recalcs, but that one is > willing to take that hit) > > Suppose the decision is to go ahead and make the auto-cost change. Is is > possible that the calculated OSPF paths will be different if one uses > OC-48 > or OC-192 as the reference bandwidth? > > Thanks Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49973&t=49973 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
