I don't know too much about the Nokia boxes, but have
done quite a bit of work on Pix's.  I witnessed the
515 fail at between 20-30 mbs  (a documented bug).  I
found that to be very lame.  Also, did quite a bit of
testing with cisco on the PIX 535.  If anyone cares to
see when that thing fails....let me know.  You might
be suprised  :)


ms


--- Eric  wrote:
> The Checkpoint/Nokia 330 runs IPSO as the OS on
> hardened freeBSD. These will
> actually run routing protocols too, i.e.., RIP,
> OSPF, IGRP, etc.... Nice GUI
> too...They do dominate their market segment.
> 
> Eric
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chuck Larrieu" 
> To: 
> Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 1:50 PM
> Subject: OT - Firewall performance Comparisons - is
> it quitting time
> [7:30576]
> 
> 
> > I sure love slow days like today. I've discovered
> a whole new section on
> the
> > company intranet - a group that does performance
> and acceptability testing
> > for vendor equipment which we sell.
> >
> > So I'm looking over the firewall report - Cisco
> 515 versus several other
> > things.
> >
> > I have never seen or heard this before, but
> according to this doc,
> > Checkpoint on a Nokia 330 box outperformed the PIX
> 515 substantially. by
> > about 20% in terms of throughput. I have always
> heard that PIX outperforms
> > Checkpoint by a large margin. Maybe that was when
> compared to Checkpoint
> on
> > a Windoze box?
> >
> > Interesting to see in the results was that the
> Cisco 1601 with IP firewall
> > feature set outperformed the Cisco 2610 by a
> decent ( but not
> overwhelming )
> > margin. The PIX 515 looks to be about 50% faster
> than the 1601 and twice
> as
> > fast as the 2610.
> >
> > The PIX 515  was about twice as fast, in terms of
> throughput, than the
> $500
> > Netscreen 5XP ( low end ) firewall
> >
> > Granted, the testbed was limited in that there
> were just a few stations on
> > the inside trying to get to just a few stations on
> the outside. Traffic
> > simulation was used for different types of traffic
> ( http, ftp, etc )
> > Granted there are  other issues, such as
> scalability.
> >
> > Still, it sure looks to be an interesting year
> ahead, in the security
> > products market.
> >
> > Happy New Year, everyone!
> >
> > Chuck
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30590&t=30590
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to