Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]

2001-07-07 Thread Jeongwoo Park
Hi all To make myself clearer, I put output of "sh ip route connected" What I asked previously was that I was not able to ping 10.20.1.104 that is said to be directly connected, Serial 0.1 I was wondering what ip address it would be WAMS>sh ip ro c 172.16.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 49 sub

RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]

2001-07-07 Thread John Feuerherd
JP, Your not going to be able to ping 10.20.1.104. 10.20.1.104 is not an interfaces IP address, it's the network that interface Serial 0.1 is on. You would need to ping one of the interfaces IP address's. (10.20.1.105-106). JF Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=

Re: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]

2001-07-07 Thread Nigel Taylor
rom: Jeongwoo Park To: Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 4:58 PM Subject: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] > Hi all > To make myself clearer, I put output of "sh ip route connected" > What I asked previously was that I was not able to ping 10.20.1.104 that is > said to be

RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]

2001-07-07 Thread Jeongwoo Park
al Message- From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 2:36 PM To: Jeongwoo Park; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] Jeongwoo, I'll only make one suggestion in saying with the /30 mask what exactly

RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266]

2001-07-07 Thread Lupi, Guy
Message- From: Jeongwoo Park To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 7/7/01 6:31 PM Subject: RE: Output of sh ip route connected [7:11266] That's what I couldn't figure out. I think 10.20.1.104 must be host ip address, not network address. Am I understanding wrong? Like you recommended, I was ab