RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Ciaron Gogarty
Not yet, hopefully soon. The only Firewall hardware platform that I'm aware of that supports it is the Nokia with Checkpoint. -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Reed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 July 2002 16:33 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Jeffrey Reed
: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] I am not sure I would class a PIX as a router in the true sense of the word, yes it does route traffic from interface to interface but would I use it as a router, NO, it only supports ONE routing

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Jeffrey Reed
2002 7:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] Im still pretty green with PIX in general and was talking today about introducing a PIX into an existing network. The customer has a router (not controlled by them) that has three public class C subnets defined. Th

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Robertson, Douglas
. Unless you are using secondary addresses and not subinterfaces. Doug -Original Message- From: Ciaron Gogarty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 11:18 AM To: Robertson, Douglas; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] Hi Richard, The simple

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Ciaron Gogarty
|third-ip segment hope this helps, C -Original Message- From: Robertson, Douglas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 July 2002 15:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] I am not sure I would class a PIX as a router in the true sense

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Robertson, Douglas
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] Why don't people get the notion that a "Firewall" is essentially a router. PIX = Firewall = Router... Firewall = Router. It ROUTES >>> "Jeffrey Reed" 07/16 8:19 PM >>> I?m still p

FW: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread GEORGE
PROTECTED] Subject: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] Im still pretty green with PIX in general and was talking today about introducing a PIX into an existing network. The customer has a router (not controlled by them) that has three public class C subnets defined. They are not using VLANs, so

RE: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Jeffrey Reed
From: Richard Tufaro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979] Why don't people get the notion that a "Firewall" is essentially a router. PIX = Firewall = Router... Firewall

Re: PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-17 Thread Richard Tufaro
Why don't people get the notion that a "Firewall" is essentially a router. PIX = Firewall = Router... Firewall = Router. It ROUTES >>> "Jeffrey Reed" 07/16 8:19 PM >>> I?m still pretty green with PIX in general and was talking today about introducing a PIX into an existing network. The custo

PIX Design Considerations [7:48979]

2002-07-16 Thread Jeffrey Reed
Im still pretty green with PIX in general and was talking today about introducing a PIX into an existing network. The customer has a router (not controlled by them) that has three public class C subnets defined. They are not using VLANs, so the router has an interface and two sub-interfaces going