to
perform, whereas the pix is more focused on specific functions.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Guruprasad Sanjeevi
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 11:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PIX Questions [7:65806]
Hi group,
I have a few
The PIX is not a router, however it does have a routing table and can
participate in a limited fashion in certain routing protocols, like RIP.
To answer your 2nd question, there is no functional difference between the
IOS and PIX doing nat/pat. Its just a difference in configuration really.
Newer versions of the PIX OS have more routing protocol support such as
OSPF. Vs. 6.3
-Original Message-
From: Ben W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX Questions [7:65806]
The PIX is not a router, however it does have
]
Subject: RE: PIX Questions [7:65806]
The PIX is not a router, however it does have a routing table and can
participate in a limited fashion in certain routing protocols, like RIP.
To answer your 2nd question, there is no functional difference between the
IOS and PIX doing nat/pat. Its just
Ben W wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The PIX is not a router, however it does have a routing table and can
participate in a limited fashion in certain routing protocols, like RIP.
I'm afraid I have to disagree. The Pix is a router. Basically, any device
that will forward packets
Hi group,
I have a few questions
1. Is PIX a Router?
2. How different is a PIX and Router in handling NAT PAT?
For the 2nd question is I have a pix and 5 valid ips (range) for my
internal network to access the internet. It allows only 3 machines at
any time to
Access the
6 matches
Mail list logo
