Re: PIX and NAT with VPN

2001-02-16 Thread anthony kim
Original Message - > From: "Groupstudy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 2:38 AM > Subject: Re: PIX and NAT with VPN > > > > The PIX does not route. Period. > > > > - Original Mess

Re: PIX and NAT with VPN

2001-02-16 Thread Allen May
Message - From: "Groupstudy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 2:38 AM Subject: Re: PIX and NAT with VPN > The PIX does not route. Period. > > - Original Message - > From: Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Newsgroups

Re: PIX and NAT with VPN

2001-02-16 Thread Groupstudy
The PIX does not route. Period. - Original Message - From: Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:35 PM Subject: Re: PIX and NAT with VPN > I'm totally foreign to PIX but I'm j

Re: PIX and NAT with VPN

2001-02-15 Thread ItsMe
Use a "static" to itself, takes presidence over NAT. Or you can use NAT 0 but you can only use it once. ""Rick Holden"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a PIX firewall that is being used for a VP

Re: PIX and NAT with VPN

2001-02-15 Thread Kenneth
I'm totally foreign to PIX but I'm just wondering, maybe it's possible to use policy-based routing on PIX? "Rick Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have a PIX firewall that is being used for a V

PIX and NAT with VPN

2001-02-15 Thread Rick Holden
I have a PIX firewall that is being used for a VPN as well. The problem is all the inside addresses are being translated to public addresses even when the traffic is destine for the VPN tunnel. I tried the following commands but this seems to block all translations. (real IPs have been replaced fo