Original Message -
> From: "Groupstudy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 2:38 AM
> Subject: Re: PIX and NAT with VPN
>
>
> > The PIX does not route. Period.
> >
> > - Original Mess
Message -
From: "Groupstudy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 2:38 AM
Subject: Re: PIX and NAT with VPN
> The PIX does not route. Period.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Newsgroups
The PIX does not route. Period.
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:35 PM
Subject: Re: PIX and NAT with VPN
> I'm totally foreign to PIX but I'm j
Use a "static" to itself, takes presidence over NAT.
Or you can use NAT 0 but you can only use it once.
""Rick Holden"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a PIX firewall that is being used for a VP
I'm totally foreign to PIX but I'm just wondering, maybe it's possible to
use policy-based routing on PIX?
"Rick Holden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002001c097b6$60c466a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have a PIX firewall that is being used for a V
I have a PIX firewall that is being used for a VPN as well. The problem is
all the inside addresses are being translated to public addresses even when
the traffic is destine for the VPN tunnel. I tried the following commands
but this seems to block all translations.
(real IPs have been replaced fo
6 matches
Mail list logo