Re: Private phone numbering [7:26021]

2001-11-14 Thread VoIP Guy
It can. At home it definitly does. Once you get a PBX or KSU, you havemore control over the exstensions. If you order one number for the main site and you have extensions that you have to dial to get to the individual phones from the automated attendant, then you can make those extensions what

Re: Private phone numbering [7:26021]

2001-11-14 Thread John Tafasi
So extension part of a phone numer does not come from telco, is that corect? Thanks John Tafasi ""VoIP Guy"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > DID is the "public address" of voice, but you may still need to map over DID > numbers to your internal extensions. Otherw

Re: Private phone numbering [7:26021]

2001-11-13 Thread VoIP Guy
DID is the "public address" of voice, but you may still need to map over DID numbers to your internal extensions. Otherwise you need an auto-attendant that asks you to enter the extension of the person you are trying to reach, which could be considered the NAT of voice, since you need a box to rou

CID: Private phone numbering [7:26021]

2001-11-12 Thread John Tafasi
Hello Group, When designing an enterprise voice network, is it normal practice to give phone devices private phone numbers that have to be translated to a valid phone number when calling another external phone number, that is to say, similar to IP NAT translation? Does any body know about a good