Re: Provider VPN Caveats [7:73207]

2003-07-31 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
One thing that gets missed in the L2VPN versus L3VPN issue, with provider-provisioned LANs, is the people aspect both for the provider and customer. If you provision a L2VPN, it's a familiar interface to the customer. It's also much more familiar to telco/TDM technicians. I've seen market

Re: Provider VPN Caveats [7:73207]

2003-07-30 Thread Network Phantom
John Neiberger wrote: I've been researching different types of service provider VPNs in general and Qwest's PRN, in particular. From what I can gather their PRN is a 2764-based VPN offering using IPSec tunneling. I've run into two fairly obvious caveats already and I'm wondering what other

Re: Provider VPN Caveats [7:73207]

2003-07-30 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 9:54 PM + 7/29/03, Chuck Whose Road is Ever Shorter wrote: BTW, I think it was dre who suggested I read the RFCs, which I've started to do, and suggested I check out the www.lightreading.com website. That site is great! I did do a search on Kompella vs. Kompella. I feel that

Provider VPN Caveats [7:73207]

2003-07-29 Thread John Neiberger
I've been researching different types of service provider VPNs in general and Qwest's PRN, in particular. From what I can gather their PRN is a 2764-based VPN offering using IPSec tunneling. I've run into two fairly obvious caveats already and I'm wondering what other caveats might await that

Re: Provider VPN Caveats [7:73207]

2003-07-29 Thread
John Neiberger wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I've been researching different types of service provider VPNs in general and Qwest's PRN, in particular. From what I can gather their PRN is a 2764-based VPN offering using IPSec tunneling. I've run into two fairly obvious caveats