Re: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]

2001-07-16 Thread John Neiberger
I'm going to assume that the router ignored the last '2' so you effectively typed 0x2104. But, since the thrid and fourth bit positions in the last nibble aren't used, this is the same as 0x2100. On a 2600/3600 that would cause it to boot to ROM monitor mode. I'm not sure what it does on a 1601

RE: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]

2001-07-16 Thread Ayers, Michael
Try this: 2104 and 2102 should look the same, but 1042 would get you 1200 baud. Try setting your console to 1200 and see if it works Michael -Original Message- From: Richard Bosire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]

2001-07-16 Thread Harrison, Michael
describes the config register in detail. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_fix/cis2000/c2000 qs/22812.htm -Original Message- From: Ayers, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 4:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142

Re: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]

2001-07-16 Thread Darren S. Crawford
I suspect it's a baud rate issue. There are some trick registers that proctors will use to mess with your mind. This is probably one of them. Darren At 03:58 PM 7/16/2001 -0400, Richard Bosire wrote: >Hellos' > >I have a cisco 1601 router which I entered confreg 0x21042 instead of >0x2142 duri

Re: 0x21042 instead of 0x2142 [7:12534]

2001-07-17 Thread Richard Bosire
Thanx Ayers, this worked ./bosire "Ayers, Michael" wrote: > Try this: 2104 and 2102 should look the same, but 1042 would get you 1200 > baud. Try setting your console to 1200 and see if it works > > Michael > -Original Message- > From: Richard Bosire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > S