I just did a PIX install, and I don't recall the "inbound / outbound"
statements, I do recall applying the ACL's with an inbound statement. I
even remember that ACL's can only be applied inbound, which I thought of as
a limitation, though I can't come up with a scenario off the top of my head
to support my position ;->. The PIX with the last couple of code rev's is
moving (well pushing) towards the use of ACL's vs. the legacy "conduit"
statements. Once you have the NAT concepts nailed, setting up the ACL's on
the PIX is pretty much like doing it in Cisco IOS.
HTH
______________________________
Thomas Crowe
Senior Systems Engineer / Architect
CTS Professional Services - Atlanta
Phone: 770-664-3900
Cell: 404-277-4089
______________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Langa Kentane
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 6:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Access lists or inbound/outbound statements [7:20250]
Greetz,
I am new to the world of Pix firewalls. I would just like to get your
opinion on which is better to use, normal extended access lists or
inbound/outbound statements.
I have experience with extended access lists on cisco routers but I only
just got to know about inbound/outbound statements...
What does the list recommend and why!
[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name
of Thomas Crowe.vcf]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=20260&t=20250
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
