>It's my understanding that route reflectors are used in small >networks,confederations are used in larger networks.
If anything, at least in the ISP context, it's probably more the other way around. Remember also that you can build hierarchies of route reflector clusters. ISPs, as opposed to enterprises, tend not to have a lot of internal policies about what can go where. They also make increasing use of MPLS in their cores coordinated with BGP at the edge. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bob Dixon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 12:32 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: OT: BGP confeds versus RouteReflectors > > >Folks, > >Anyone have any real-world pro's/con's for BGP confeds versus >RouteReflectors. It seems that routereflectors are easier to configure, >but I was not sure of the actual technical reasons to have 2 >technologies that seem to address the same problem. > >Thanks, >Bob Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28139&t=28139 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
