EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 8:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCNA 2.0: Classful or Classless?
doesn't 12.0 default to classless?
> I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip
> classless," we should assume classfu
The latest version (2.1) of Cisco's Networking Academy curriculum still teaches
classful addressing. It does however now mention VLSM for the first time as an
advanced topic. This curriculum was released around Jan/Feb this year. My
guess would be that at the CCNA level you would still assume c
Ok, maybe I'm a ditz. I've been telling people that when you are preparing
for a test you are expected to understand the default behavior of the IOS
version you are being tested on. If the question does not specify a
different configuration from the default, then assume the default. Sometimes
the
doesn't 12.0 default to classless?
> I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip
> classless," we should assume classful. It'd be nice if I were wrong...
>
> - Don
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: We
I'm only guessing, but my assumption is that until IOS defaults to "ip
classless," we should assume classful. It'd be nice if I were wrong...
- Don
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
Don't you just love the new exam outline? Looks like they gave up the sushi
at those meetings and just went with the tequila... [=`)
Dale
>From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: CCNA 2.0: Classful or
6 matches
Mail list logo
