Re: CCNP Complete, Passed CID 3.0 640-025 [7:45289]

That's a complete possibility =) Wouldn't be the first time hehe Mike W. wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Perhaps your thinking is a bit off. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45319&t=45289 --

Re: CCNP Complete, Passed CID 3.0 640-025 [7:45289]

In any case, Ill study whats in Top Down.. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45317&t=45289 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

Re: CCNP Complete, Passed CID 3.0 640-025 [7:45289]

Perhaps your thinking is a bit off. "Michael L. Williams" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/29/2002 09:38 AM Please respond to "Michael L. Williams" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: CCNP Complete, Passed CID 3.0 640-025 [7:45

Re: CCNP Complete, Passed CID 3.0 640-025 [7:45289]

I can't speak for him, but I think he was "complaining" about (so to speak) was that SNA and ATM were not on the outline (implying they were on the exam). Mike W. "Kris Keen" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I sit this exam in a few weeks, you are saying I sho

RE: CCNP Complete, Passed CID 3.0 640-025 [7:45289]

I sit this exam in a few weeks, you are saying I shouldnt study SNA? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45301&t=45289 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misco