RE: CEF or round robin

2001-01-21 Thread Steve Smith
Changed back to CEF and it is balanced on packets sent and received withing 20 or so. Seem good to me. -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 5:31 PM To: Steve Smith; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: CEF or round robin So what was

Re: CEF or round robin

2001-01-20 Thread Jason A. Diegmueller
> Two T1's going to the same ISP? Why not use PPP and make one big pipe? I > like simple answers. > > Check your port/speed/duplex settings on the new switch. Many times ISPs won't do PPP multilink due to the overhead it introduces. I've found CEF per-packet to meet my company's needs. We ha

Re: CEF or round robin

2001-01-19 Thread Michael Snyder
Two T1's going to the same ISP? Why not use PPP and make one big pipe? I like simple answers. Check your port/speed/duplex settings on the new switch. ""Chuck Larrieu"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 002601c0826f$f0c1fe40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:002601c0826f$f0c1fe40$[EMAIL PROTECTED].

RE: CEF or round robin

2001-01-19 Thread Chuck Larrieu
So what was the problem you found that was effecting traffic negatively? CEF does not necessarily "load share" equally across two paths. It can be set up to do "per source/destination" or "per packet" Per source/destination has the usual problems - all traffic can end up going across one link. P