Re: CLI vs PDM [7:49774]

2002-07-26 Thread nrf
No contest - the CLI. ""Juan Blanco"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Team, > For those security people on the Cisco World, Normally which interface do > you use the most, the CLI or the PDM. I am in the process of setting up > standards and we would like to defi

RE: CLI vs PDM [7:49774]

2002-07-26 Thread Georgescu, Aurelian
If you can live with the fact that PDM is very slow, then use PDM, it's far more intuitive for access control (which is what PIX is made for...) Aurelian -Original Message- From: Juan Blanco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 10:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject

Re: CLI vs PDM [7:49774]

2002-07-26 Thread Kevin O'Gilvie
Juan, I love your quote. Keep the CLI going I think that keeps you more tuned.. Dont want to become Checkpoint!! Or Windows vs Unix.. >From: "Juan Blanco" >Reply-To: "Juan Blanco" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: CLI vs PDM [7:49774] >Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 14:45:39 GMT > >Team, >For those s

Re: CLI vs PDM [7:49774]

2002-07-27 Thread Steven A. Ridder
PDM. It's just too easy. Or use CiscoWorks VMS or CSPM to manage a bunch of them. I can't stand the cli and it's archaic language. I'd rather make sure my FW is easy to configure so I don't miss anything. If something is too complicated, you don't even know if you have problems because you ar