RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-20 Thread Ross McCormick
> Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 8:58 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] > > > So far the password changing issue is really the only > limitation of ACS that > we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same

RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-20 Thread Chris Clark
, 2001 8:58 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] So far the password changing issue is really the only limitation of ACS that we found, but if you use it to intersect with the same database that your desktops login to (ADS for example) then

Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-19 Thread dan snyder
uot;Chris Clark" >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318] >Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:53:29 -0400 > >Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things. >The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very we

Re: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-18 Thread Chris Clark
Depends on what you are using it for. It can do a lot of different things. The main gotcha is that it can not handle password changes very well. ""Stepp Harless"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Does anyone have any experience good or bad with Cisco Secure Access

RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-17 Thread george gittins
im running version 2.4 and so far smooth as hell. nice and easy configuration excelent product.although the newer version out there havent tried them out -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sub

RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-16 Thread Art _
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7). But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't check it, though). Arthur Davis CCIE #6430 Message Posted at: http://www

RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-16 Thread Art _
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7). But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't check it, though). Arthur Davis CCIE #6430 Message Posted at: http://www

RE: Cisco Secure ACS for NT/2000 [7:16318]

2001-08-16 Thread Art _
It's a great product, well-designed for wireless authentication (ver 2.7). But if you don't need that and want to save $6k, you can set up IAS service on a Win2k server to do RADIUS authentication (maybe TACACS too, didn't check it, though). Arthur Davis CCIE #6430 Message Posted at: http://www