switchport mode trunk
spanning-tree portfast
From: Karen E Young
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Emile Harding
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco VLAN Help-Group Study [7:62293]
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:45:00 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net
-tree portfast
From: Karen E Young
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Emile Harding
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cisco VLAN Help-Group Study [7:62293]
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 18:45:00 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net ([207.69.200.57]) by
mc5-f13.law1
can you please provide the Ethernet and ethernet subinterface configurations
for the router?
can you provide the configurations for the appropriate switch ports?
do you have the default gateways configured correctly on the workstations?
do you need ip subnet-zero configured on the router? (
The router has under router eigrp 100 a network statement for 192.168.0.0
but not for 192.168.1.0
-Original Message-
From: Emile Harding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco VLAN Help-Group Study [7:62293]
I am
Emile,
Here's what I see right off hand...
1) You aren't trunking. The switch isn't set up for it.
Pick a port to connect the switch to the router with and configure it to
trunk. Make sure that it isn't set up with a VLAN as this can interfer witht
eh trunking.
Example, if you want FE0/1 to be
Since the interfaces are directly connected it shouldn't matter. The routes
are already there. Doesn't need EIGRP for that. Remember your administrative
distances.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 2/1/2003 at 2:02 AM Daniel Cotts wrote:
The router has under router eigrp 100 a
6 matches
Mail list logo
