:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 6:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
Right now I'm dealing with a situation in which my company has two redundant
frame relay links to Botany Australia. One through Sprint, and the other
through ATT. We were
or
whatever, but *something* is amiss here
- Original Message -
From: Chuck Larrieu
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
The world is a single point of failure. :-
Seriously, something often overlooked - the ISP's themselves
. Wilson
To:
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2001 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
Right now I'm dealing with a situation in which my company has two
redundant
frame relay links to Botany Australia. One through Sprint, and the other
through ATT. We were experiencing really bad latency
The world is a single point of failure. :-
Seriously, something often overlooked - the ISP's themselves, their
backbones, their peering.
Not too long ago, up in the Sacramento area, some folks found out the hard
way that even though they were dual homed, both ISP's used the same backbone
I have a client who needs absolute complete redundancy for their Internet
service.
At one level, I will say that I discuss a great many options in
redundancy fromt he enterprise side in my book, WAN Survival Guide.
But let me also quote from Chapter 7 of that book, and try to put
absolute in
Here is a link on HSRP and understanding it:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/ics/cs009.htm#xtocid122331
From: Andy Barkl
Reply-To: Andy Barkl
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Complete Redundancy [7:8409]
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:08:36 -0400
I have a client who needs
6 matches
Mail list logo
