Coyotepoint was the first server load balancing device I had ever
heard of outside of your basic LSNAT configuration (I think Cisco
calls it NAT load-sharing or something, but there is an RFC also).
However, I've never actually seen one in production on any
network. Around 1997-8 the Cisco Local
I have a pair of CS11152 (former arrowpoints) and they've been flaky. I do
not recommend them. Not sure about coyotepoint.
""dre"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Coyotepoint was the first server load balancing device I had ever
> heard of outside of your basic L
havent used it. we just installed F5 load balancing and it doesnt work. we
havent had any problems with our local director but it is not going to be
supported any more.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Zeitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
What problems have you had with the Arrowpoint Sam?
We do mainly Foundry for load balancing, and I have to say (as I'm not using
my work e-mail address :-)) that they have been flaky as hell. We work
fairly closely with Foundry (when we can get in touch), but every box seems
to work differently w
First off, failover takes close to a minute which is a lot more than Cisco
advertises(in HA config). Second they're supposed to provide for load
balancing using SSL. This simply does not work on ours even though we
followed the config on their site exactly. Third they're very tempermental.
We migr
That's interesting. We've been using the Arrowpoint switch for
load-balancing with sticky SSL sessions for over a year now and have had
no problems at all.
However, we're going to be replacing that box with two of
something-or-other, we just haven't decided on what yet.
John
>>> "sam sneed"
You're right, the Cisco/Arrowpoint box doesn't do this very well,
either. We're not using SSL acceleration yet, but we're currently
redesigning that part of the network to include it. I don't know if
there are any boxes that can do URL testing easily. I believe there are
some that support scrip
I asked Nortel/Alteon how there web switches compare with Coyotepoint, this
is what they sent me. If you feel like filling in what Aeropoint can do,
feel free. I thought it was cool that it can do SSL load balancing. The
other thing about coyote only having 2 ports, ports go bad a lot on web
devic
You are correct. In the post you made today you simply said that SSL
load balancing wasn't working and you didn't mention keepalives. I
thought you meant that you weren't even able to get SSL load balancing
to work correctly.
We are still using pings for keepalives which works fine if your syst
9 matches
Mail list logo
