Vincent,
TACACS+ is much more robust and reliable than TACACS. Having said that,
robustness and reliability are in the eye of the beholders. I am running
TACACS+ (it's free by theway) on a Unix box and it is running very
smoothly. I wish I can say the same thing about TACACS+ on Microsoft
Wind
Th URL below gives a few comparisons between the *three* versions of TACACS.
Watch the wrap:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/secur
_r/srprt2/srtacs.htm
Regards,
Gareth
""Vincent"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
99nuig$isc$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:99
Check out the following link.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/614/7.html
Chris Lemagie
Systems Engineer
Cisco Systems
Seattle Commercial Region
(425) 468-0959
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cisco.com/
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Vince
This is really more information than you've requested but I thought it was a
good enough discussion to post anyway. It comes from CBT Systems (now
Smartforce) Cisco Securty Systems CBT:
Cisco has developed the CiscoSecure Access Control Server (ACS) family of
security
servers, which supports bo
4 matches
Mail list logo