RE: Disable telnet port (Cisco Trivia) [7:3289]

2001-05-05 Thread Brian
a 3com can do it with rarp, and I see you can use ip rcmd remote-host ip-address, though I have not tried it. I'll stop flailing now and go crash. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Sat, 5 May 2001, Brian Dennis wrote: No it's not a bug or security hole. The object

Re: Disable telnet port (Cisco Trivia) [7:3289]

2001-05-05 Thread Vincent Chong
Are you going connect local and remote router via bridging? rgds; Vincent Chong Brian Dennis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... No it's not a bug or security hole. The object is to connect to a router remotely (i.e. over a WAN) that doesn't have an IP address

Re: Disable telnet port (Cisco Trivia) [7:3289]

2001-05-05 Thread Jason
1. I assume across WAN means using routable protocol. 2. IPX is the alternative routable protocol. 3. SNMP supports IPX ... Not having tested that with Cisco, I cannot be sure... is that one of the solutions ? Jason Brian Dennis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... No

RE: Disable telnet port (Cisco Trivia) [7:3289]

2001-05-04 Thread Brian Dennis
No it's not a bug or security hole. The object is to connect to a router remotely (i.e. over a WAN) that doesn't have an IP address configured. Brian -Original Message- From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 10:49 PM To: Brian Dennis Cc: [EMAIL

RE: Disable telnet port (Cisco Trivia) [7:3289]

2001-05-04 Thread Brian
Well, without an ip, I see a minor issue with the inability to put a remote ip into the tcp header, unless there's a trick I am not aware of. Is the wan link frame relay? perhaps router's ability to autoconfig dlcis may be of help. Brian Sonic Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On