Re: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]

I read that somewhere that the group did that. Another BBC article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_1321000/1321176.stm -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > >And sp

Re: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]

>And speaking of my .sig, India has recently given up their Avian Carrier >based system for e-mail. So, they are no longer RFC 1149 Compliant : ( > >It's a true story and not a joke. > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1892000/1892085.stm > I beg your pardon. They were n

Re: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]

And speaking of my .sig, India has recently given up their Avian Carrier based system for e-mail. So, they are no longer RFC 1149 Compliant : ( It's a true story and not a joke. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1892000/1892085.stm -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head:

Re: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]

Don't forget rfc 3552: ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3252.txt -- RFC 1149 Compliant. Get in my head: http://sar.dynu.com ""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > A 'shade' off the mark? Would that be a regular lampshade or perhaps a > MPLampS shade

RE: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]

A 'shade' off the mark? Would that be a regular lampshade or perhaps a MPLampS shade? ;-) >>> "Tom Ranalli" 4/1/02 10:45:47 AM >>> Well-described comments on your part, may I add. Perhaps a shade off the mark, though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE

RE: Focus on RFCs [7:40046]

Well-described comments on your part, may I add. Perhaps a shade off the mark, though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Neiberger Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 9:01 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Focus on RFCs [7:40046] I think th