This would be when you are using the Gigastack options? Isn't normal
operation of Gigabit is FULL DUPLEX. My thoughts were that collisions on
Gigabit were bug/hardware problems, not flow control, normal, or
representation of giants.
Neil
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.p
operation.
- Original Message -
From: "David j"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 6:11 PM
Subject: RE: Gigabit Ethernet & Collisions [7:73555]
> Is it really working at gigabit speed?, there are several interfaces which
> are able to work at 10/100/1000 speeds
>
, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: W. Alan Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Gigabit Ethernet & Collisions [7:73555]
Additionally, gig
Are your interfaces copper or fiber...
Larry Letterman
Cisco Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Gigabit Ethernet & Collisions [7:73555]
Is it really workin
to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
> or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: W. Alan Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:38 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Is it really working at gigabit speed?, there are several interfaces which
are able to work at 10/100/1000 speeds
Neil Andersen wrote:
>
> What would cause show interface for a Gigabit interface to show
> increasing collisions? My understanding is that Gigabit
> Ehternet only runs in FULL DUPLEX
You have a setup you would like to share?
Martijn
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Neil Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 6 augustus 2003 2:06
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Gigabit Ethernet & Collisions [7:73555]
This would be when you are using
No configuration, just studying for my CCIE re-cert and since I have to take
the 350-001 test now, I was looking at this from a testing perspective.
Maybe I should have asked if you were Cisco asking a test question [since
the Q&A don't always match reality ;-) and you have to think what Cisco
con
8 matches
Mail list logo
