RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >CC: Nigel Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update >Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 11:29:07 +1100 (EST) > >This is a

RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
ot;Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update >Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 16:44:24 -0800 > >i su 172.16.0.0/16 [115/30] via 0.0.0.0, Null0 > > >Nigel, the

RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread dward
This is a generated summary route for the class which as a summary is routed via null0. Remember a route only gets entered into the table or advertised if it exists so all summaries get routed to null0 which is the bit bucket interface and that way the 'route' is active. If this is a problem t

RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread Chuck Larrieu
i su 172.16.0.0/16 [115/30] via 0.0.0.0, Null0 Nigel, the other interesting thing about this route as I see it, is the last part of the line. The source is IS-IS, the su maybe we are guessing it is short for summary, but we don't know, and then we get to that route via 0.0.0.0 comma null0 Witho

RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
Hey Chuck, See Inline >From: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"Cisco Group Study" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "CCIE_Lab Group Study" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread Raul F. Fernandez
rom: "Chuck Larrieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Cisco Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "CCIE_Lab Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 12:28 PM Subject: RE: ISIS and OSPF redistr

RE: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread Chuck Larrieu
Nigel, question #1, can you ping from domain to domain? Particularly from IS-IS to OSPF? Question #2, isn't the creation of the route to null 0 established behaviour on Cisco routers when summarization is invoked, no matter what the protocol involved? I was planning on doing a couple of the Slat

Re: ISIS and OSPF redistribution Weirdness - Update

2001-01-10 Thread Nigel Taylor
ere. Trying to tie up this part of my studying on this topic soon... Thoughts.. Nigel.. - Original Message - From: Thounda Craig, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: 'Nigel Taylor' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 9:41 AM Subject: RE: ISIS and OSPF redis