There types of flows:
Destination - per {dest} flow
Source Destination - per {source/dest address} pair
IP (aka Full) Flow - per {source, dest, protocol and port} set
Look under the section labeled Flow Mask Modes
hth,
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Sean Wolfe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my understanding of MLS, the first paragraph is correct. Each
unidirectional sequence of packets with same source and destination and
transport layer is always a separate flow. The second paragraph seems to be
referring to the destination-ip flow mask, in which different flows with the
same des
I disagree. There are not 3 types of flows, just 3 ways to switch them.
"destination-ip—The least-specific flow mask. The MLS-SE maintains one
MLS entry for each destination IP address. All flows to a given destination
IP address use this MLS entry. This mode is used if there are no access
lists
rs together is terrible
2) Pick the full flow mask since you are being asked about "masks"
I wouldn't lose any sleep over this one =]
cheers,
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Thorne Gene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think your argument makes a lot of sense.
Turpin, Mark wrote:
>
> I can understand your disagreement. But I hope you will
> understand that
> its semantics at this point. A flow by any other name is still
> a flow.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=51350&t=5
5 matches
Mail list logo
