RE: OSPF - Cool + an area question [7:11861]

2001-07-14 Thread Symon Thurlow
from a coolness perspective, I agree! I just got my lab going for the first time, configured basic eigrp and started looking at what is going on. It's fun! Symon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ole Drews Jensen Sent: 11 July 2001 03:41

RE: OSPF - Cool + an area question [7:11861]

2001-07-10 Thread Dusty Harper
Most people that I know (including Microsoft's Routing Lab scenario) just use a single number. Starting with Area 0, then Area 1, Area 2 -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 07:41 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OSPF -

Re: OSPF - Cool + an area question [7:11861]

2001-07-10 Thread David Schaer
Ole, In my lab, I generally use simple, single decimal values. However, in a production environment you may wish to use the dotted-quad form if you want to want to represent meaningful data withing the area ID. As an example consider the ospf-numbering format for RutgersU:

Re: OSPF - Cool + an area question [7:11861]

2001-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
Anyway, I do have one OSPF question to those of you who have been out there messing with it many times: What's the most common/practical method when designing the OSPF network. Is it to give the area a single decimal value (n), or one that matches and/or looks like an IP address (a.b.c.d), which