My two cents.... Another thing that is very important and critical with redistribution is the metric being used in both directions... Juan
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nigel Taylor Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2003 3:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OSPF BGP redistiribution question [7:66430] Chuck, My first thought is what does the "sh ip bgp for the routes that does not show up in BGP indicate. I believe there is a requirement not to disable "sync" which suggest that the routes not being added to the BGP, isn't sync'd with the IGP. Does any of this have route information being propagated from an IBGP neighbor. Nigel ----- Original Message ----- From: "The Long and Winding Road" To: Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2003 2:27 AM Subject: OSPF BGP redistiribution question [7:66430] > NLI ( b..o..o..t..c..a..m..p.. lab 8 ) redistribution of OSPF and BGP > > I checked CCO and the "answer" key > > everything "appears" to be correct. > > So why is it that half my OSPF routes do not show up in the BGP table??? > > *> 137.20.0.0 0.0.0.0 0 32768 ? > * i137.20.40.16/28 137.20.25.2 164 100 0 i > *> 0.0.0.0 110 32768 i > *> 137.20.100.33/32 0.0.0.0 138 32768 i > *> 137.20.100.34/32 0.0.0.0 74 32768 i > *> 137.20.100.35/32 0.0.0.0 74 32768 i > *>i172.168.70.0/24 137.20.10.70 170 100 0 3 i > *> 172.168.80.0/24 137.20.86.1 0 0 1 i > R# > > O IA 200.200.200.0/24 [110/75] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > 137.20.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 12 subnets, 4 masks > O E1 137.20.200.16/28 [110/110] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.30.0/24 [110/84] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.25.0/24 [110/74] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.20.0/24 [110/84] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > O E1 137.20.40.16/28 [110/110] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.88.0/24 [110/75] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.100.33/32 [110/138] via 137.20.64.5, 02:19:42, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.100.35/32 [110/74] via 137.20.64.5, 02:19:42, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.100.34/32 [110/74] via 137.20.64.5, 02:19:42, Ethernet0 > O IA 137.20.100.0/24 [110/10] via 137.20.64.5, 02:19:42, Ethernet0 > O IA 200.200.100.0/24 [110/75] via 137.20.64.5, 02:27:46, Ethernet0 > > lest you wonder, I am using the proper ( so I think ) form of the > redistribute comand, covering OSPF internal and external ) > > router bgp 2 > no synchronization > bgp log-neighbor-changes > network 137.20.20.0 mask 255.255.255.0 backdoor > network 137.20.25.0 mask 255.255.255.0 backdoor > network 137.20.30.0 mask 255.255.255.0 backdoor > network 137.20.40.16 mask 255.255.255.240 > network 137.20.88.0 mask 255.255.255.0 backdoor > network 137.20.100.33 mask 255.255.255.255 > network 137.20.100.34 mask 255.255.255.255 > network 137.20.100.35 mask 255.255.255.255 > network 137.20.100.0 mask 255.255.255.0 backdoor > network 137.20.200.16 mask 255.255.255.240 backdoor > network 200.200.100.0 backdoor > network 200.200.200.0 backdoor > redistribute ospf 239 match internal external 1 external 2 ((( -------SEE > I told you so! > neighbor 137.20.25.1 remote-as 2 > neighbor 137.20.25.1 ebgp-multihop 3 > neighbor 137.20.86.1 remote-as 1 > > > any help appreciated > > Chuck! > > -- > TANSTAAFL > "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66490&t=66430 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
