king about OSPF then ask if there were
other
ways
to accomplish the same goal by using a non-protocol dependent,
non-router
platform
dependent method?
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
ssage-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 10:14
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OSPF Route Summarization Trick Question [7:23771]
Yep, distribute-lists could work in conjuction with Jonathan's
suggestion of redistributing a static route. I
Yep, distribute-lists could work in conjuction with Jonathan's
suggestion of redistributing a static route. I wanted to know how to
suppress the more-specific subnets and a distribute list would work. It
would be pretty unwieldy for more than a few routes but it definitely
would work.
Are you t
I thought of that solution (#3) but I wasn't sure if that was what he
was referring to. Usually, in the context of CCIE lab studies, the labs
state that you can't use static routes. However, this wasn't part of
the lab, it was just in the Hints section of a lab so that restriction
might not have
Here's my guess. I've included the first two for clarity.
1. Inter-area route summarization with commands of the form
"area 1 range 10.1.2.0 255.255.224.0"
2. External route summarization with commands of the form
"summary-address 10.1.2.0 225.255.224.0"
3. Static route of the form
"i
5 matches
Mail list logo
