At 10:15 PM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote:
>""Zsombor Papp"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > At 07:54 AM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote:
> > >""hebn"" wrote in message
> > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
> > > >how does cisco router
""Zsombor Papp"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> At 07:54 AM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote:
> >""hebn"" wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
> > >how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500
> > > bytes(m
At 07:54 AM 7/12/2003 +, Hemingway wrote:
>""hebn"" wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
> >how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500
> > bytes(more than 122 links in one area)?
>
>
>I've browsed through the other r
""hebn"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
>how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500
> bytes(more than 122 links in one area)?
I've browsed through the other responses, and I did not see this particular
piece of info
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> At 5:48 AM -0700 7/10/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
> >I guess our views on OSPF are slightly different.
> >
> >I will now release the stage to the next "how to increase the
> value
> >of the CCIE certification" thread... :)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Zsombor
>
> Zsombor, I ap
At 07:41 PM 7/10/2003 +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>At 5:48 AM -0700 7/10/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
> >I guess our views on OSPF are slightly different.
> >
> >I will now release the stage to the next "how to increase the value
> >of the CCIE certification" thread... :)
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> >Zso
At 5:48 AM -0700 7/10/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
>I guess our views on OSPF are slightly different.
>
>I will now release the stage to the next "how to increase the value
>of the CCIE certification" thread... :)
>
>Thanks,
>
>Zsombor
Zsombor, I appreciate the discussion. I've been running at low spe
At 5:40 PM -0700 7/9/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
>At 11:07 PM 7/9/2003 +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>At 12:43 PM + 7/9/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
>>>The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA that is
>>>larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200
interfaces
At 11:07 PM 7/9/2003 +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >Hello packets. IIRC, about 47 router entries can fit into an OSPF
> >hello packet with a 1500 byte MTU. Consider the timing complexities
Btw, neighbors are identified by their 4-byte router ID, so it would take
more than 350 neighbors to
At 11:07 PM 7/9/2003 +, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>At 12:43 PM + 7/9/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
> >The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA that is
> >larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200
interfaces).
> >I can't see how such an LSA could be divi
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> At 12:43 PM + 7/9/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
> >The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA
> that is
> >larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200
> interfaces).
> >I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple
>
At 12:43 PM + 7/9/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
>The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA that is
>larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200 interfaces).
>I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple OSPF messages so
>the only logical (implemen
At 05:14 PM 7/9/2003 +, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Zsombor Papp wrote:
> >
> > The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA
> > that is
> > larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200
> > interfaces).
> > I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into
Zsombor Papp wrote:
>
> The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA
> that is
> larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200
> interfaces).
> I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple OSPF
> messages so
> the only logical (implementation indepe
>hebn wrote:
>>
>> hello,everyone:
>
>>OSPF use raw socket (datagram) to communicate with peers. In
>> general, layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
>>how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed
>> 1500 bytes(more than 122 links in one area)?
>
>Well, I don't have a
The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA that is
larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200 interfaces).
I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple OSPF messages so
the only logical (implementation independent) solution seems to be to
fr
At 2:42 AM + 7/9/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>>
>> At 10:46 PM + 7/8/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
>> >The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer.
>>
>> Do you know for certain this is what Cisco's implementation
>> does?
>> The OSPF code is aware of the MTU
Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>
> At 10:46 PM + 7/8/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
> >The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer.
>
> Do you know for certain this is what Cisco's implementation
> does?
> The OSPF code is aware of the MTU and can build OSPF packets
> for it.
> I don't think you're reall
The original question (as I understood) was about a single LSA that is
larger than 1500 bytes (think Type 1 LSA for a router with 200 interfaces).
I can't see how such an LSA could be divided into multiple OSPF messages so
the only logical (implementation independent) solution seems to be to
fr
At 10:46 PM + 7/8/03, Zsombor Papp wrote:
>The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer.
Do you know for certain this is what Cisco's implementation does?
The OSPF code is aware of the MTU and can build OSPF packets for it.
I don't think you're really going to simplify it by relieving it of
t
The LSA will be fragmented at the IP layer.
Thanks,
Zsombor
At 11:39 AM 7/8/2003 +, hebn wrote:
>layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
>how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed 1500
>bytes(more than 122 links in one area)?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groups
At 9:38 PM + 7/8/03, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>hebn wrote:
>>
>> hello,everyone:
>
>> OSPF use raw socket (datagram) to communicate with peers. In
> > general, layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
I'm not sure I'd call it a strict datagram protocol. In some cases,
it's acknowl
hebn wrote:
>
> hello,everyone:
>OSPF use raw socket (datagram) to communicate with peers. In
> general, layer 2 frame has a MTU of 1500 bytes.
>how does cisco router propagate router-lsa whose size exceed
> 1500 bytes(more than 122 links in one area)?
Well, I don't have a definite a
23 matches
Mail list logo
