RE: Off Topic - Technical Review, OR What do I know? :->

2000-06-26 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
card how do l go about it. >Thanks > >James > >-Original Message- >From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 1:36 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: Off Topic - Technical Review, OR What do I know? :-> > > >

Re: Off Topic - Technical Review, OR What do I know? :->

2000-06-20 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
A Cisco editor would have caught that! ;-) It means prioritize SNA before e-mail, i.e. SNA is higher priority than e-mail. SNA on a LAN is encapsulated in something, such as TCP/IP and Ethernet, (thought that is not at all relevant.) Priscilla At 09:39 PM 6/19/00, Chuck Larrieu wrote: >So, I

Re: Off Topic - Technical Review, OR What do I know? :->

2000-06-19 Thread Paul Borghese
I think he is referring to SNA -vs- E-Mail. E-Mail is usually not a time-critical application while SNA usually is time sensitive. Therefore, you may want to prioritize your SNA traffic to have a higher prioritization over e-mail. Paul - Original Message - From: Chuck Larrieu <[EMAIL

RE: Off Topic - Technical Review, OR What do I know? :->

2000-06-19 Thread Feliz, Edgar
Chuck, I think he meant to prioritize the encapsulated SNA traffic, so it is first in the output queues. NOT to encapsulate it in email. Prioritize it over the email traffic. EF -Original Message- From: Chuck Larrieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 12:39 AM To: