RE: PIX 5.3 and icmp [7:41941]

2002-05-02 Thread Andrew Larkins
I would rather go with the access-lists. Conduit is the older way of doing things, but still works fine. -Original Message- From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 01 May 2002 15:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX 5.3 and icmp [7:41941] It should work with

RE: PIX 5.3 and icmp [7:41941]

2002-05-01 Thread x
I did some research and echo-reply is the same as 0. However, I ran into another problem. I couldn't run tracert from my windows machine so I went back to any any until I get a few minutes to figure out how to enable outbound trace routes. --- Ole Drews Jensen wrote: > It should work with > >

RE: PIX 5.3 and icmp [7:41941]

2002-05-01 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
It should work with conduit permit icmp any any 0 That would allow the ping to return home, but should not allow ping requests from outside unless you have another "hole" somewhere else. Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE,

RE: PIX 5.3 and icmp [7:41941]

2002-04-19 Thread Ole Drews Jensen
It should work with conduit permit icmp any any 0 That would allow the ping to return home, but should not allow ping requests from outside unless you have another "hole" somewhere else. Hth, Ole ~ Ole Drews Jensen Systems Network Manager CCNP, MCSE,