Re: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]

2002-06-14 Thread Gaz
OTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Roberts, Larry > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:16 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454] > > No, but 6.2(1) is :) > > PDM 2.0 is also available. Have both in my lab and they seem pretty > stable > so far. > > Th

RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]

2002-06-13 Thread Lidiya White
By the way, PDM 2.0.1 is deferred now. Wait for 2.0.2... -- Lidiya White -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roberts, Larry Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 10:16 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454] No, but 6.2(1) is

Re: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]

2002-06-13 Thread Gaz
We put it straight on our production Pix's along with the new PDM (VIPs, groups etc). We decided that if we didn't have any faith why should any of our customers, and we really wanted to play with the Groups anyway. No problems so far. Must be a month or so now. Gaz ""Clayton Dukes"" wrote in m

Re: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]

2002-06-13 Thread Wayne Jang
it is ""Clayton Dukes"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Howdy, > Dows anyone know if the PIX 6.2 software is available yet? > > > Clayton Dukes > Cisco Info Center SE > CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i

Re: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]

2002-06-13 Thread Clayton Dukes
Cool, thanks :-) Clayton Dukes CCNA, CCDA, CCDP, CCNP, NCC - Original Message - From: "Roberts, Larry" To: "'Clayton Dukes'" ; Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 11:05 AM Subject: RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454] > No, but 6.2(1) is :) > > PDM 2.0 is also

RE: PIX 6.2 [7:46454]

2002-06-13 Thread Roberts, Larry
No, but 6.2(1) is :) PDM 2.0 is also available. Have both in my lab and they seem pretty stable so far. Thanks Larry -Original Message- From: Clayton Dukes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PIX 6.2 [7:46454] Howdy, Dows