! Mail Plus - Powerful.
Affordable. Sign up now
-Original Message-
From: mike greenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 9:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX Client WIN2000 Internet sharing [7:57988]
This is correct. IPSec will NOT through PAT
nope, it won't work...ipsec needs it's own IP address and not PAT. i've
tested this extensively, and it won't work...if anyone else can comment,
please do.
either way, best thing to do is get a few statics from your ISP and
statically translate...
ed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
if not
sorry for wasting your time.
-Original Message-
From: Edward Sohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX Client WIN2000 Internet sharing [7:57988]
nope, it won't work...ipsec needs it's own IP address and not PAT. i've
Sohn
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2002 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: PIX Client WIN2000 Internet sharing [7:57988]
nope, it won't work...ipsec needs it's own IP address and not PAT. i've
tested this extensively, and it won't work...if anyone else can comment,
please do.
either way
This is correct. IPSec will NOT through PAT. At the moment, Pix does NOT
support NAT traversal (udp encapsulation). Therefore, trying to connect
to a Pix behind a NAT device with vpn dialer will not work. VPN
concentrators,
on the other hand will work. Or better yet, throw away your Pix and
5 matches
Mail list logo
