Chuck,
Round times will be roughly the same regardless of whether there's 1
T1 or 8 T1's in the multilink bundle. There is a limit to the speed
bits will move in copper.
However, the more T1's you have in the bundle, the more bits you can
send at the same time.
I'd suggest you retry your
This is just a pre-morning-coffee thought. I'm thinking that multiple
links only help if you're actually needing the extra bandwidth. If
you're not generating more than 1.544 Mbps of traffic, I would expect
the round-trip times to be at least fairly similar regardless of which
configuration you
Chuck,
My first thought is that the router your using doesn't have the horsepower
to make it a fair test. If it's a 2500 series, I have been told, but not
verified, that it's CPU cannot even fill 2 T1's worth of traffic. Also, if
your running the tests from the router itself, packets generated
Yes you verified what I have harped a few times, the added complexity
of multilinking not to mention the several bugs I have encountered, is
why I say just use CEF and load share per packet/destination. Also
multilinking nor CEF give your greater speed but you do have more
bandwidth. If you
What was the inter-packet gap between pings? Were they pushing right up
against each other, with some wanting to go out while others were still
being output? What other traffic was the router trying to pump out, if any?
I'm thinking you would need to have packets queued up waiting to go out to
Hmm.. If this were the case, though, wouldn't I expect to only see 64Kbps of
bandwidth for a single user session on a 128K multilinked ISDN call?
Seems to me if the link were loaded up properly, you'd see the combined
aggregate.
Paul Lalonde
MADMAN wrote in message
[EMAIL
Yes I said you would see the combined aggregate, you can send twice as
much data but your not aggregating the speed, i.e. 2 T1's are two 1.5M
links, even when bundled they do not have a clock of 3M but the
bandwidth of 3M.
That may seem obvious but I have had calls from those that did the
math
Hi
Very interesting. I would be interested in seeing the CPU load between
methods too. I will venture to say that CPU usage of the multilink is the
highest.
John Hardman CCNP
Chuck Larrieu wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
A couple of weeks ago there were a couple
8 matches
Mail list logo
