-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 10:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Please confirm (conf#ae1fd8f45b2bed8613ddb184751dc1a9)
Hi, You have tried to post to GroupStudy.com's Professional mailing list. Because the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be required to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE). By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following: 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements. 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product. 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting. 5. The message is NOT inflammatory. 6. The message is NOT a test message. To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations. Welcome to GroupStudy.com! ------ORIGINAL MESSAGE--------- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 31 02:59:30 2002 Received: from ubdccomjhbex.usko.com (ubdccomjhbex.usko.com [196.41.203.13]) by groupstudy.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA19697 GroupStudy Mailer; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 02:59:28 -0500 Received: by UBDCCOMJHBEX with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:03:07 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andrew Larkins To: Cisco Mail List Subject: EIGRP Summary address funny Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 10:02:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi all, I tried this yesterday and got some funny results. A client of ours uses another private company to do long haul connections to overseas sites. They (the private company) are redistributing their OSPF routes into my EIGRP process. They have recently had some instability on some of their numerous routes, so I tried using summary addressing on the router that connects to my clients network. The summary was correct and actually showed correctly in the routing table on the upstream router. Problem: Even though the summarised route is in the table, the 100's of host routes are also there, all pointing to the same place. Now the users in the UK could not connect. I removed the summary addresses and all ok again - just the summarised route gone from the routing tables. This particular router is using ver 11.1 ( really old!!) Now this summarisation works on all the other routers correctly. Any idea's Andrew Larkins BCom, CCNP, CCDA Bytes Technology Networks A Division of the Bytes Technology Group A Member of the Altron Group www.btgroup.co.za visit the press office @ www.itweb.co.za/office/bytes Tel : +27 11 800 9336 Fax : +27 11 800 9496 Mobile : +27 83 656 7214 Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] OR [EMAIL PROTECTED] "This message may contain information which is confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or telephone and return and/or destroy the original message." > > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33838&t=33838 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]