Do you mind or can you be a little more detail with this. Was it a
duplicate mac address which never should happen but does from time to
time (remember the old kingston flaw in the early 90's about 150,000 nic
cards same mac).
Or was it a duplicate ip address. I could see if it was a duplicate ip
where someone has the same ip as the concentrator that would cause
remote clients to be disconnected, but a duplicate MAC I have never seen
a cisco device with a duplicate mac.

Just curious to exactly what happened.

-----Original Message-----
From: Umar Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 4:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Problem Solved: Cisco 3005 VPN concentrator issues. [7:57495]


Hi all,

Problem solved - It was an arp issue  !! such a simple thing :) The
customer had a rogue mac address on their layer 3 switch that was
causing the intermittent connectivity.

Thanks all for your help !!

""Elijah Savage III""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I have 2 concentrators setup in load balancing function and we had the

> same issue but ours was not resolved by split tunneling. We had to 
> flash both concentrators and this problem went away , there was a bug 
> on bug track which cisco informed me off at the time I was working on 
> this. Before enabling split tunneling I would I would flash my 
> concentrators first if there is no need for split tunneling.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Brandis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 3:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Cisco 3005 VPN concentrator issues. [7:57495]
>
>
> I had the similar type of problem, remote users (broadband) would lose

> connectivity and get the remote peer not respondin, your ipsec session

> has been termintated error. The problem that I had, was with the 
> broadband ISP, in this case Telstra. Telstra use a bpa hart beat 
> packet, just so Telstra knows that the dsl customer is still there. 
> Should telstra not get this packet, they drop the dsl connection, thus

> terminating your vpn session. Also, you may want to check your session

> time-out variable.
>
> I resolved my error by splitting the networks, as previously I had 
> tunnel everything.
>
> john
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Umar Ahmed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, 15 November 2002 8:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Cisco 3005 VPN concentrator issues. [7:57495]
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Ive got a customer who has a 3005 concentrator connected to our 
> network. He has setup a vpn connection which he accesses from home 
> over the public internet. The problem he and the other 200 users are 
> having is that they are loosing connectivity to the box intermittently

> throughtout the day. When he has loss of service, I can ping the vpn 
> box directly connected to my network, whats even more strange, is that

> I can ping other customer hosts on the same subnet . Any ideas ??
>
> Regards,
>
> Umar.
> **********************************************************************
>
> visit http://www.solution6.com
>
> UK Customers - http://www.solution6.co.uk
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> The Solution 6 Head Office and Branch in Sydney is moving premises.
>
> From Monday 25th November our Head Office and NSW Branch will be 
> located
> at:
>
> Level 14, 383 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000.
>
> General Phone: 61 2 9278 0666
>
> General Fax: 61 2 9278 0555
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> This email message (and attachments) may contain information that is 
> confidential to Solution 6. If you are not the intended recipient you 
> cannot use, distribute or copy the message or attachments.  In such a 
> case, please notify the sender by return email immediately and erase 
> all copies of the message and attachments.  Opinions, conclusions and 
> other information in this message and attachments that do not relate 
> to the official business of Solution 6 are neither given nor endorsed 
> by it.
>
> *********************************************************************




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=57698&t=57698
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to