Thanks!  Looks like I'll be visiting Stacey's bookstore again during lunch  
I've bought so many tech books there I've earned a $100 freebie.

>>> Daniel Cotts  08/24/01 12:12PM >>>
I just looked in "Cisco LAN Switching" from Cisco Press by Clark and
Hamilton. A great reference book.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:07 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Subject: RE: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs
> [7:17166]
> 
> 
> Thanks for clearing this up!  This comes as a tremendous a 
> relief to me and inquiring minds on my other mailing lists 
> 
> >>> Daniel Cotts  08/24/01 11:15AM >>>
> Portfast does not disable spanning-tree. It is meant for 
> connections between
> an endstation PC and a switch. Upon PC startup the link 
> immediately goes
> into forwarding mode. If a loop did exist the link would transition to
> blocking.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patricia Leeb-Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Subject: Re: Problem Using external routers to route between VLANs
> > [7:17166]
> >
> >
> > Hamid,
> > Don't know if you've already seen this, but check out
> >
> >http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/50.shtml#cisco2600 
> >
> > From what I see on this page, it would appear that a 
> > FastEthernet port is
> > required for interVLAN routing.
> >
> > BTW, group, I noticed in the configuration section of this 
> > page that there's
> > this statement on the two switch interfaces being trunked:
> >
> > spanning-tree portfast
> >
> > I was told that PORTFAST disabled spanning-tree?? Have I 
> > been given bogus
> > information or is this possible on the swtich model given (3512-XL)?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17187&t=17187
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to