RE: Procurve vs. Catalyst [7:58225]

2002-11-27 Thread Luong, David
Cisco is King, enough said. -Original Message- From: Edward Sohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 27, 2002 1:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Procurve vs. Catalyst [7:58225] i'm looking for ways to convince my customer to migrate to an all-cisco environment,

RE: Procurve vs. Catalyst [7:58225]

2002-11-27 Thread David j
I faced this situation (more or less) short time ago, I had to decided whether using HP 5300XL or not, they are Layer 3 and cheaper than a Cisco 4000, but finally I decided not buy them because, afaik, they don't implement VRRP or HSRP. Other reason: I think you can't use CSWI, because you need to

RE: Procurve vs. Catalyst [7:58225]

2002-11-27 Thread Brunner Joseph
Another point, in a big network how does HP match Backbonefast Uplinkfast PVLANning In a big network, these things are VERY important, and I think they are cisco proprietary ? Can someone please comment, on STP tweaks that can be done with HP (any stp ieee compliant switch) to equal what cisco