If there's a risk that John Doe could gain access to the NT and Unix
systems where the sniffer software is running, then this does seem very
unsafe. It would be better to run sniffer software on a machine that is not
capable of supporting multiple users and doesn't support remote access.
Sniff
If it is truely in promiscuos mode, there should not be any problem. You
can test this by pinging the ip address. (It should not respond)
alot of drivers do not allow for full promiscuity however. Remember it's
not the app that talks to the nic, it's the driver. Some companies do offer
promisc
ubject: Re: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]
If it is truely in promiscuos mode, there should not be any problem. You
can test this by pinging the ip address. (It should not respond)
alot of drivers do not allow for full promiscuity however. Remember it's
not the app that t
4), rc(8), routed(8)
HISTORY
The ifconfig command appeared in 4.2BSD.
4.2 Berkeley Distribution February 13, 1996
3
bash-2.03$
-Original Message-----
From: Anatoly Shein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Promisc
be able to install sniffer software on a
compromised machine anyway.
Priscilla
>-Original Message-
>From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:04 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:04 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]
>
>
>If it is truely in promiscuos mode, there should not be any problem. You
>can test this by pinging the ip add
if you guys would just stop using hubs and
non-unicast mac-addresses, we'd all be fine =)
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:
ECTED]
Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]
It rally depends on your version of ifconfig/what kernel your using/what
adapter you have.
Tell us those things and we'll try and help.
otherwise read RTFM
(granted the man page doesnt have the promisc flag, the option
age-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:34 PM
To: Anatoly Shein; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]
It rally depends on your version of ifconfig/what kernel your using/what
adapter you have.
Tell us th
vance
toly
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Ramsey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]
well as long as nobody is on your local subnet, you should be fine... I mean
it would be nothing to t
network with down NIC ! )
toly
-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:34 PM
To: Anatoly Shein; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Promiscous interface and remote users [7:16734]
It rally depends on your version of ifconfig/what kerne
11 matches
Mail list logo
