RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353]

2003-01-21 Thread mjans001
: "mjans001" Onderwerp: Re: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353] would the isp have to do anything or would i just impliment the qos on my router? Thanks for the help - - Original Message - From: ""mjans001"" Newsgroups: groupstudy.cisco Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 200

RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353]

2003-01-20 Thread Larkin, Richard
: mjans001 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 21 January 2003 6:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You may need to use Priority Queueing, and hardcode telnet High prio based on an access-list. Normal traffic despools

RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353]

2003-01-20 Thread mjans001
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You may need to use Priority Queueing, and hardcode telnet High prio based on an access-list. Normal traffic despools after telnet queue is empty. If you are sure that there will always be bandwitfh left for other traffic, PQ will do fine. That is on

RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353]

2003-01-20 Thread Andrew Larkins
In QoS now, there is more than just setting the bandwidth allocated to each class. What you need to do is combine this with the diffserv bit. This is basically the newer version of the TOS bit in the IP header that defines what sort of service happens to the packet. In a nut shell, this means whic

RE: QOS on 2621xm [7:61353]

2003-01-20 Thread Andrew Larkins
You will need to QoS on both sides of the link. Your side should be fine, but good luck with the ISP side. I would use the diffserve bits as well as bandwidth allocation using policy maps. Andrew -Original Message- From: Julian P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 January 2003 10:02 To: